IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb597/57.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysing change in transnational policy networks: legitimacy-transfers in the Bologna Process

Author

Listed:
  • Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth

Abstract

Drawing on theories of legitimacy and democratic deficits in international politics this paper provides an actor-centered relational approach of mapping legitimacy-flows within the transnational policy network of the Bologna Process for a European Higher Education Area. It is shown that legitimacy (either in the form of symbolical or institutional capital conveyed in political speech acts) can be treated as a matter of exchange and bargaining just as other resources, such as money or information. The legitimacy-network of the Bologna Process does not reflect the often lamented lack of democracy in international political setting. While transfers of legitimacy are the most prevalent type of relation in the policy network, there is no unidirectional flow from national societal actors to supranational public actors, but rather a polyvalent exchange. With respect to legitimacy as a political resource the Bologna Process is therefore not hierarchical, it is a bazaar.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth, 2007. "Analysing change in transnational policy networks: legitimacy-transfers in the Bologna Process," TranState Working Papers 57, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/24969/1/538517298.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meckling, Jonas, 2003. "Netzwerkgovernance: Corporate Citizenship und Global Governance," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2003-006, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Hurrelmann, Achim & Krell-Laluhová, Zuzana & Schneider, Steffen, 2005. "Mapping legitimacy discourses in democratic nation states: Great Britain, Switzerland, and the Unites States compared," TranState Working Papers 24, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zesbrde.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.