Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Vom Nationalstaat zum Mitgliedstaat und wieder zurück? Modifikationen 'offener Staatlichkeit' durch das Lissabon-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts

Contents:

Author Info

  • Franzius, Claudio
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Europäisierungsprozesse werden vielfach als Bedrohung wahrgenommen. Weil das spezifisch 'europäische' am Transformationsprozess von Staatlichkeit nicht so richtig zu fassen ist, bleibt als Ausweg nur die Argumentation mit dem Staat. So auch im Lissabon-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, das sich wie ein Lehrbuch zur allgemeinen Staatslehre liest. Zwar wird der Staat des Grundgesetzes erstmals ausdrücklich als europarechtsfreundlich ausgewiesen. Doch das Gericht öffnet den Staat nicht nur gegenüber den europäischen Herausforderungen und begreift ihn als Mitgliedstaat, sondern zieht der Preisgabe von Souveränität auch Grenzen und versteht ihn als Nationalstaat. Dagegen, dass Integration demokratisch verantwortet werden muss, lässt sich wenig sagen. Ob sich aber mit der neuen Identitätskontrolle unter der im Urteil überstrapazierten 'Ewigkeitsgarantie' des Art. 79 Abs. 3 GG ein verantwortungsvoller Umgang mit dem Europarecht einstellen wird, bleibt abzuwarten. Der Staat geht nicht in Europa auf, das ist die Botschaft des Gerichts. In der partikularistischen Perspektive scheint sich der zweite Senat vom Leitbild offener Staatlichkeit zu verabschieden. Dann sollte aber auch darauf verzichtet werden, Europa einfach vom Staat aus denken. -- Europeanization processes are often perceived as a threat. Because it is hard to grasp what is specifically European in the transformation process of the state, the only way out often seems to be to fall back on the state. The Lisbon ruling of the German Constitutional Court is a case in point, reading like a textbook on the general theory of state. To be sure, the State of the Grundgesetz is, for the first time, attested as being friendly towards European Law, and the Court opens the state towards the European challenges and describes it as a member state - but at the same time it imposes clear limits on the surrendering of sovereignty, perceiving it as a nation state. There is not much to be said against the notion that integration has to be democratically accountable. However, it remains to be seen whether the new identity control under the eternity clause of Art. 79 para 3 Grundgesetz will result in a more responsible approach to European law. The state will not be absorbed by Europe - that is the message relayed by the Federal Constitutional Court, which in the particularist perspective seems to say goodbye to the concept of open statehood. In this case, however, it should also abstain from thinking Europe simply in terms of the state.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/37092/1/632112476.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State in its series TranState Working Papers with number 124.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 2010
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:124

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Parkallee 39, 28209 Bremen
    Phone: 0421/218-4362
    Fax: 0421/218-7540
    Web page: http://www.sfb597.uni-bremen.de/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.