IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb475/200008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Meta-analysis: Different methods - different conclusions?

Author

Listed:
  • Böckenhoff, Annette
  • Hartung, Joachim

Abstract

Different estimation methods for covariance parameters in meta-analyses can result in conflicting p-values concerning the test of treatment effect. We propose a valid method to overcome this problem at least partially by introducing a new estimator for the standard deviation of the common treatment difference.

Suggested Citation

  • Böckenhoff, Annette & Hartung, Joachim, 2000. "Meta-analysis: Different methods - different conclusions?," Technical Reports 2000,08, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:200008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/77254/2/2000-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dean A. Follmann & Michael A. Proschan, 1999. "Valid Inference in Random Effects Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 732-737, September.
    2. Thomas Mathew & Kenneth Nordstrom, 1999. "On the Equivalence of Meta-Analysis Using Literature and Using Individual Patient Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1221-1223, December.
    3. Böckenhoff, Annette & Hartung, Joachim, 1998. "Some corrections of the significance level in meta-analysis," Technical Reports 1998,23, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kepher Henry Makambi, 2002. "On pooling data summaries in the absence of interactions “response-by-study”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 11(1), pages 127-138, February.
    2. Ding‐Geng Chen & Dungang Liu & Xiaoyi Min & Heping Zhang, 2020. "Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random‐effects meta‐analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1319-1329, December.
    3. repec:jss:jstsof:36:i03 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Julian P. T. Higgins & Simon G. Thompson & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2009. "A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 137-159, January.
    5. repec:jss:jstsof:30:i07 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Knapp, Guido & Hartung, Joachim, 2000. "Combined test procedures in the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials," Technical Reports 2000,09, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    7. Klaus Martin & Annette Böckenhoff, 2006. "Analysis of variance of paired data without repetition of measurement," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 90(3), pages 365-384, September.
    8. Sidik, Kurex & Jonkman, Jeffrey N., 2006. "Robust variance estimation for random effects meta-analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(12), pages 3681-3701, August.
    9. Hartung, Joachim, 1998. "An alternative method for meta-analysis," Technical Reports 1998,46, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    10. Ao Huang & Kosuke Morikawa & Tim Friede & Satoshi Hattori, 2023. "Adjusting for publication bias in meta‐analysis via inverse probability weighting using clinical trial registries," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2089-2102, September.
    11. Joachim Hartung & Dogan Argaç & Kepher Makambi, 2002. "Small sample properties of tests on homogeneity in one—way Anova and Meta—analysis," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 197-235, April.
    12. Janie McDonald & Patrick D. Gerard & Christopher S. McMahan & William R. Schucany, 2016. "Exact-Permutation-Based Sign Tests for Clustered Binary Data Via Weighted and Unweighted Test Statistics," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 698-712, December.
    13. Schmidli, Heinz & Neuenschwander, Beat & Friede, Tim, 2017. "Meta-analytic-predictive use of historical variance data for the design and analysis of clinical trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 100-110.
    14. H. M. James Hung & Xiangmin Zhang & Sue-Jane Wang, 2018. "Some Recent Advances on Statistical Approaches for Planning Multi-regional Clinical Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(2), pages 460-472, August.
    15. Elena Kulinskaya & Stephan Morgenthaler & Robert G. Staudte, 2014. "Combining Statistical Evidence," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 214-242, August.
    16. Han Chen & Alisa K. Manning & Josée Dupuis, 2012. "A Method of Moments Estimator for Random Effect Multivariate Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1278-1284, December.
    17. G. Baker Stuart & S. Lindeman Karen, 2013. "Revisiting a Discrepant Result: A Propensity Score Analysis, the Paired Availability Design for Historical Controls, and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 51-82, June.
    18. Hartung, J. & Makambi, K. H., 1999. "Simple t-distribution based tests for meta-analysis," Technical Reports 1999,38, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    19. Keisuke Hanada & Tomoyuki Sugimoto, 2023. "Inference using an exact distribution of test statistic for random-effects meta-analysis," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 75(2), pages 281-302, April.
    20. Evangelos Kontopantelis & David Reeves, 2010. "metaan: Random-effects meta-analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 10(3), pages 395-407, September.
    21. Dog-super-˜an Argac & Kepher Makambi & Joachim Hartung, 2001. "A note on testing the nullity of the between group variance in the one-way random effects model under variance heterogeneity," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 215-222.
    22. Evangelos Kontopantelis & David A Springate & David Reeves, 2013. "A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:200008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isdorde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.