IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb475/199910.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the triangle test with replication

Author

Listed:
  • Kunert, Joachim
  • Meyners, Michael

Abstract

We consider the triangle test with replications, i.e. each assessor is asked repeatedly. A commonly used test statistic for this situation is the sum of all correct assessments, summed over all assessors. Several authors (e.g. o’Mahony, 1982, Brockhoff and Schlich, 1998) argue that the binomial distribution cannot be used to analyse this kind of data. Brockhoff and Schlich (1998) propose an alternative model for the triangular test with replicates, where the assessors have different probabilities to correctly identify the odd sample even if the products are identical. Although we agree that assessors will have different probabilities of correct assessment if there are true differences, we do not think that Brockhoff and Schlich’s model makes sense under the null hypothesis of equality of treatments. We show that all assessments are independent and have success probability 1/3, if the null hypothesis is true and the experiment is properly randomized and properly carried out. This implies that the sum of all correct assessments is binomial with parameter p = 1/3. Therefore the usual test based on this sum and the critical values of the binomial distribution is a level α test for the null hypothesis of equality of the products, even if there are replications.

Suggested Citation

  • Kunert, Joachim & Meyners, Michael, 1999. "On the triangle test with replication," Technical Reports 1999,10, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:199910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/77236/2/1999-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Meyners, 2005. "Deriving a lower bound for the proportion of perceivers in replicated difference tests by means of multiple test theory," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 225-246, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:199910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isdorde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.