IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb475/199812.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal vs. classical linear dimension reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Röhl, Michael C.
  • Weihs, Claus

Abstract

We describe a computer intensive method for linear dimension reduction which minimizes the classification error directly. Simulated annealing Bohachevsky et al (1986) is used to solve this problem. The classification error is determined by an exact integration. We avoid distance or scatter measures which are only surrogates to circumvent the classification error. Simulations in two dimensions and analytical approximations demonstrate the superiority of optimal classification opposite to the classical procedures. We compare our procedure to the well-known canonical discriminant analysis (homoscedastic case) as described in Mc Lachlan (1992) and to a method by Young et al (1986) for the heteroscedastic case. Special emphasis is put on the case when the distance based methods collapse. The computer intensive algorithm always achieves minimal classification error.

Suggested Citation

  • Röhl, Michael C. & Weihs, Claus, 1998. "Optimal vs. classical linear dimension reduction," Technical Reports 1998,12, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:199812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/77322/2/1998-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:199812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isdorde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.