IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kdifoc/83.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Government Policy for the Stable Growth of the Sharing Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Min Jung

Abstract

The sharing economy is expected to contribute to the enhancement of social welfare with its wide range of benefits, including creation of new transactions and promotional and market testing opportunities, if risk factors such as crowding out of existing transactions and transaction and social risks can be properly controlled. Accordingly, an institutional framework is needed to support the stable growth of the sharing economy and the unique characteristics of non-professional, peer-to-peer transactions should be reflected in tandem with regulatory equity between existing and sharing economy suppliers. For this, transaction volume-based regulations are recommended. Furthermore, to secure regulatory effectiveness and to alleviate transaction risks, the pertinent obligations must be imposed on sharing platforms. - There is increasing demand for in-depth analysis of and policy response to the sharing economy which is growing fast on the back of technological advances. - Within the concept of the sharing economy, idle assets have great significance. The sharing economy basically involves transactions between nonprofessional peers. - Primary benefits expected from the sharing economy are creation of new transactions and resulting improvements in the welfare of sharing economy participants. - Businesses participating in the sharing economy can also expect promotional and market testing effects. - Other expected benefits include vitalization of local economy and reduction in environmental costs. - The sharing economy could crowd out some existing transactions that provide similar services. - The crowding out of existing transactions will exacerbate when regulations are applied unfairly to suppliers from existing and sharing businesses. - The sharing economy encompasses several transaction risks including information asymmetry, uncertainty in ex-post handling and weak trust in platforms. - Negative external effects could be triggered, marring social safety. - In laying the institutional framework to support the stable growth of the sharing economy, the government must consider both the economy's unique characteristics and regulatory equity. - Transaction volume-based regulations are recommended for the sharing economy. - To strengthen the effectiveness of transaction volume-based regulations, certain obligations must be imposed on platforms. - As for transaction risks, government policies need to play a supplementary role while placing its focus on sharing platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Min Jung, 2017. "Government Policy for the Stable Growth of the Sharing Economy," KDI Focus 83, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifoc:83
    DOI: 10.22740/kdi.focus.e.2017.83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/200884/1/kdi-focus-83.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22740/kdi.focus.e.2017.83?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Min Jung, 2019. "Benefits and Concerns of the Sharing Economy: Economic Analysis and Policy Implications," KDI Journal of Economic Policy, Korea Development Institute (KDI), vol. 41(1), pages 15-41.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifoc:83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kdiiikr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.