IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kdifoc/30.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What Do Academic Achievement Analyses Say about Primary and Secondary Education?

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Hisam

Abstract

High investment in school education does not necessarily lead to higher academic achievement. Therefore, an increase in students' motivation and other contributory causes is more important than an increase in quantitative input. - Academic achievement is a key indicator for measuring the outcomes of education. - If the teacher evaluations filled out by students for professional development provides effective feedback, it can contribute to improving academic achievement - Reducing the number of students per teacher will not necessarily guarantee improvement of academic achievement without innovative teaching methods. - Level-based instruction has limitations under a relative evaluation system in which the students take identical tests regardless of their levels, aptitude, and future plans. - The negative impact of coed schools partly stems from the students' loss of study hours and lack of learning flow while attending high school. - Teachers and parents should make every effort to help students develop the capacity for self-directed learning, which is more effective than private education at increasing scores with each increasing grade level. - In order for coed schools to achieve their educational potential, they must first establish a gender-sensitive educational environment, accompanied by sophisticated management.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Hisam, 2013. "What Do Academic Achievement Analyses Say about Primary and Secondary Education?," KDI Focus 30, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifoc:30
    DOI: 10.22740/kdi.focus.e.2013.30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/200841/1/kdi-focus-30.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22740/kdi.focus.e.2013.30?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifoc:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kdiiikr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.