IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/jhtiwp/61.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Results of the European Photo International Cross-comparison Course as part of the quality assurance of the crown condition assessment 2015 (Photo ICC 2015)

Author

Listed:
  • Meining, Stefan
  • Morgenstern, Yvonne
  • Wellbrock, Nicole
  • Eickenscheidt, Nadine

Abstract

Photo ICCs represent one of different measures for quality assurance of the crown condition survey, which is part of the European forest monitoring. The European Photo ICC 2015 took place between June 23rd and September 29th and was carried out for the three regions Northern, Central and Mediterranean Europe. In total 123 teams participated. The defoliation and assessable crown were assessed on the basis of photos for all main tree species of one region. Half of the photos had already been used at the Photo ICC 2010. The mean deviation of the countries from the weighted median of all countries of one region was evaluated as well as the occurrence of outliers and the specification of the assessable crown. The repeatedly used photos further enabled the evaluation of the assessment continuity. The results reveal a good homogeneity of the defoliation assessment within Europe. The mean deviation of the countries usually lay within a ±10%-interval and most countries only showed few outliers. For some regions and tree species, however, systematic differences in the defoliation assessment among countries were observed. Countries participating in the Photo ICC for two regions, in general displayed the same trend for both regions. Differences in the definition of the assessable crown did not result in larger deviations regarding the defoliation assessment. In Central Europe, the defoliation of beech (Fagus sylvatica) and oak (Quercus robur und Q. petraea) was significantly higher for the same photos in 2015 than in 2010. This observation existed for almost all participating countries. Several reasons for this increase are possible like differences in the quality of the printed photos or varying experience of teams in the defoliation assessment. No significant differences between 2010 and 2015 were found for the investigated tree species of Northern and Mediterranean Europe as well as for the coniferous tree species of Central Europe. The results of the Photo ICC 2015 underline the need to carry out photo courses as regular quality assurance in the crown condition survey. The advantages include the reproducibility of results, the option of testing the continuity of assessment, participation of a larger number of teams and saving of costs and time. Thus, Photo ICCs represent a useful addition to nation-wide and European-wide Field ICCs to ensure data quality in the crown condition survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Meining, Stefan & Morgenstern, Yvonne & Wellbrock, Nicole & Eickenscheidt, Nadine, 2016. "Results of the European Photo International Cross-comparison Course as part of the quality assurance of the crown condition assessment 2015 (Photo ICC 2015)," Thünen Working Papers 61, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jhtiwp:61
    DOI: 10.3220/WP1469775066000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/145313/1/865460353.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3220/WP1469775066000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jhtiwp:61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vtigvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.