IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse16/148710.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How interoperable and standardised should IoT market be: A policy discussion from an EU-centric point of view

Author

Listed:
  • UNVER, Mehmet Bilal
  • VANBERG, Ayşem Diker

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) depicts a world of networked smart objects, including cars, refrigerators, health care services, wearable devices, etc. which mark a distinctive revolution in digital world. In order for this revolution to realise a certain level of interoperability and standardisation needs to take place. European Commission's previous efforts as to achieving IoT interoperability ended up some recommendations as to industrial solutions including industrial and innovation policies as well as monitoring exercises. Notwithstanding the milestones taken so far, more collaboration and solid analytical approach is needed for a future-proof and scalable solution. This paper revisits the IoT interoperability considering the previously taken measures including ex ante measures, i.e. data portability and ex post interventions, i.e. Microsoft decision. Depending on and benefiting from these progresses, the prospective standardisation and interoperability efforts are suggested to be comprehensive and detailed enough. Particularly it is suggested that future IoT standards and reference frameworks need to embody the standards applicable to data portability that are expected to be adopted in near future. It is also found that as IoT settings vary significantly a comprehensive approach would respond more appropriately to differing market situations. Last but not the least, in case industrial efforts fail to find appropriate and fitting solutions, determination of technical and legal interoperability in IoT context would rather rely on the European Commission as lack of interoperability would cause significant losses in consumer welfare and innovation capacity of the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • UNVER, Mehmet Bilal & VANBERG, Ayşem Diker, 2016. "How interoperable and standardised should IoT market be: A policy discussion from an EU-centric point of view," 27th European Regional ITS Conference, Cambridge (UK) 2016 148710, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse16:148710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/148710/1/Unver-van-Berg.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feasey, Richard, 2015. "Confusion, denial and anger: The response of the telecommunications industry to the challenge of the Internet," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 444-449.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wellmann, Nicolas, 2017. "OTT-Messaging and Mobile Telecommunication: A Joint Market? An Empirical Approach," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169503, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Peitz, Martin & Valletti, Tommaso, 2015. "Reassessing competition concerns in electronic communications markets," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 896-912.
    3. Wellmann, Nicolas, 2019. "Are OTT messaging and mobile telecommunication an interrelated market? An empirical analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9).
    4. Matinmikko, Marja & Latva-aho, Matti & Ahokangas, Petri & Seppänen, Veikko, 2018. "On regulations for 5G: Micro licensing for locally operated networks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 622-635.
    5. Wellmann, Nicolas, 2017. "OTT-messaging and mobile telecommunication: A joint market? - An empirical approach," DICE Discussion Papers 256, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse16:148710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.