IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diebps/82009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutional reform needs of Germany’s bilateral development cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Ashoff, Guido

Abstract

In 2005, the previous Federal Government had signalled that it would improve the linkage between financial and technical cooperation to make Germany’s development cooperation more efficient and effective. This had not been followed through. Germany’s official development assistance (ODA) has institutional strengths and weaknesses. Its strengths are, inter alia, its representation at cabinet level, its own ministry (BMZ) and experienced implementing organisations. Its weaknesses include capacity constraints at the BMZ, the institutional complexity of financial and technical cooperation, which has been repeatedly described as being in need of reform by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), deficits in the representation in partner countries, as well as coordination problems with other federal ministries that increasingly finance their own bilateral ODA activities. The new Federal Government should respond to the problems by introducing reforms. In addition to merging financial and technical cooperation, it will be important to concentrate and partly delegate the duties and responsibilities of the BMZ, to strengthen the representation of Germany’s development cooperation in partner countries and to improve the coordination of bilateral ODA activities of other government departments. This would increase the overall effectiveness of Germany’s development cooperation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashoff, Guido, 2009. "Institutional reform needs of Germany’s bilateral development cooperation," Briefing Papers 8/2009, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diebps:82009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199640/1/die-bp-2009-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diebps:82009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.