Judicial Detection Skill, Litigational Opportunism, and Contractual Compliance
Abstract
Mutually beneficial agreements might fail if the parties fear contractual opportunism. Litigation is supposed to prevent this, but still leaves room for litigational opportunism: Even knowing that the opponent has fulfilled his obligations, a party might bring suit. We show that with positive judicial detection skill, litigation fees can be designed to deter opportunistic suits and simultaneously induce bilateral contractual compliance. With zero detection skill, as implicitly assumed by most of the economic literature on litigation, bilateral contractual compliance cannot be induced. We apply our results to evaluate the American and the British cost allocation rules. -- Beidseitig vorteilhafte Abkommen können scheitern, wenn eine der Parteien vertraglichen Opportunismus befürchtet. Gerichtsklagen sollen diesem Problem abhelfen, eröffnen aber eine Gelegenheit für Prozeß-Opportunismus: Selbst wenn eine Vertragspartei weiß, daß die andere ihre Leistungspflicht erfüllt hat, kann sie auf Leistung klagen. Wenn Richter positive Erkenntnisfähigkeit haben, dann können Gerichtskosten so festgelegt werden, daß die Parteien von opportunistische Klagen abgeschreckt und zu vertragsgetreuem Verhalten motiviert werden. Können Richter nicht zwischen legitimen und opportunistischen Klagen unterscheiden, dann kann beideseitige Vertragseinhaltung nicht angeregt werden. Wir wenden dieses Ergebnis an, um die amerikanische und die britische Gerichtskostenregel miteinander zu vergleichen.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics in its series CSLE Discussion Paper Series with number 96-04.Length:
Date of creation: 1996
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:zbw:csledp:9604
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Postfach 151150, 66041 Saarbrücken
Phone: *49(0)681-302 2132
Fax: *49(0)681-302 3591
Email:
Web page: http://www.uni-saarland.de/fak1/fr12/csle/
More information through EDIRC
Related research
Keywords: procedural law; frivolous suits; positive detection skill; verifiability; litigation costs; American rule; British rule;Find related papers by JEL classification:
- K12 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Contract Law
- K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process
- C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.Cited by:
- Kirstein, Roland & Schmidtchen, Dieter, 1997.
"Judicial Detection Skill and Contractual Compliance,"
CSLE Discussion Paper Series
97-07, Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics.
- Kirstein, Roland & Schmidtchen, Dieter, 1997. "Judicial detection skill and contractual compliance," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 509-520, December.
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:csledp:9604For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

