IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/yor/hectdg/21-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do National Health Guidelines increase coordination level among physicians? An experimental investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Castro, M.F.
  • Romeo, D.

Abstract

Coordination is the key to the success of any organization such as the healthcare sector, where higher level of coordination result in greater promptness and quality of care and lower mortality rates. In a framed field experiment, we assess the level of coordination among healthcare providers and monitor whether common practices are adopted in a metropolitan hospital in Italy, by using the Krupka-Weber norm elicitation task. Upon being provided with three clinical vignettes, physicians have been asked to evaluate the appropriateness of each of the possible actions to match the modal judgement. Afterwards, physicians may ask for information on the actions corresponding to national guidelines and eventually change decisions. Data show that the average frequency of coordination across the experiment is 52% and that coordination increases when physicians often exchange opinions and share positive feedbacks with colleagues. Only 23% of participants changed their appropriateness judgment, after realizing they were in contrast with guidelines. In addition, the presence of a leader in the ward facilitates coordination. Finally, the more physicians consult scientific sources, the more willing to accept guidelines suggestions have been. Since guidelines knowledge significantly increases the coordination between physicians, hospitals should implement effective programs to spread guidelines contents.

Suggested Citation

  • Castro, M.F. & Romeo, D., 2021. "Do National Health Guidelines increase coordination level among physicians? An experimental investigation," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 21/09, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:yor:hectdg:21/09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/economics/documents/hedg/workingpapers/2021/2109.pdf
    File Function: Main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Castro, M.F.; & Guccio, C.; & Romeo, D.;, 2022. "An assessment of physicians’ risk attitudes using laboratory and field data," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 22/26, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    coordination game; framed field experiment; vignette; guidelines; physicians’behavior;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:yor:hectdg:21/09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jane Rawlings (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deyoruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.