IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/yon/wpaper/2020rwp-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Power to Ignore: An Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Chulyoung Kim

    (Yonsei Univ)

  • Sang-Hyun Kim

    (Yonsei Univ)

  • Myunghwan Lee

    (Yonsei Univ)

Abstract

Recent studies in experimental economics have documented that communication encourages individuals' altruism and charitable giving in various contexts. Building upon these findings, this paper incorporates and studies the influence of power differences in communication on giving behavior. We conducted a variant of dictator game experiments where a dictator is explicitly allowed to ignore a recipient's message before deciding the split. Power differences between players varied across different treatments on provision of information regarding the dictator’s reception of the message and framing on the property right of the endowment. We find evidence that dictators tend to be more generous toward recipients' messages when recipients cannot verify whether dictators have read the message. We interpret these behaviors as a demonstration of psychological mechanisms of individuals being more generous to less powerful counterparts. However, recipient behaviors imply that they have failed at anticipating dictators behaviors, as they asked for more when they had more power and asked less otherwise.

Suggested Citation

  • Chulyoung Kim & Sang-Hyun Kim & Myunghwan Lee, 2020. "Power to Ignore: An Experimental Study," Working papers 2020rwp-169, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:yon:wpaper:2020rwp-169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://121.254.254.220/repec/yon/wpaper/2020rwp-169.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Dictator game; Communication; Power; Empathy gap;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:yon:wpaper:2020rwp-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: YERI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eryonkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.