This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Hindsight Bias: The Role of Perfect Memory and Meta-Cognitions

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Schwarz, Stefan () (Sonderforschungsbereich 504)
Stahlberg, Dagmar () (Lehrstuhl fuer Sozialpsychologie, Sonderforschungsbereich 504)
Abstract

The hindsight bias is the tendency of people to falsely believe that they would have predicted the outcome of an event correctly, once the outcome is known. The present paper addresses the ongoing debate whether the hindsight bias is due to memory impairment or biased reconstruction. The memory impairment approach states that outcome information alters the memory trace for the initial judgement, whereas the biased reconstruction approach assumes that people who have forgotten their initial judgements are forced to guess and, in the presence of outcome information, are likely to use this information as an anchor. Three experiments will be presented which show that the biased reconstruction explanation provides a better explanation for empirical findings in hindsight bias research than the memory impairment explanation. In experiment 1, contrary to the predictions of the memory impairment view, outcome information did not affect the number of correct recalls (hit rate) in the experimental conditions (with outcome information). In experiment 2 the biased reconstruction approach offers a very parsimonious explanation of stronger hindsight bias in the hypothetical design than in the memory design. In experiment 3, again in line with the bias reconstruction approach, experimentally induced assumptions about how close to or distant from the outcome information the initial judgements had been, moderated the magnitude of the hindsight bias. Participants who were made to believe that their initial judgement had been close to the actual outcome showed a stronger hindsight bias. According to the memory impairment view such meta-cognitive considerations should play no relevant role.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim & Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim in its series Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications with number 99-35.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: 14 Apr 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:99-35

Note: Financial Support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 504, at the University of Mannheim, is gratefully acknowledged.
Contact details of provider:
Postal: D-68131 Mannheim
Phone: (49) (0) 621-292-2547
Fax: (49) (0) 621-292-5594
Email:
Web page: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/
More information through EDIRC

Web page: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de

Order Information:
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Carsten Schmidt).

Related research
Keywords:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The yearly budget of IDEAS is exactly $0: it relies entirely on volunteer work.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-20.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.