IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/xrs/sfbmaa/99-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hindsight Bias: A By-product of Knowledge Updating

Author

Listed:
  • Hoffrage, Ulrich

    (Sonderforschungsbereich 504)

  • Hertwig, Ralph

    (MPI for Human Development)

  • Gigerenzer, Gerd

    (MPI for Human Development, Berlin)

Abstract

After feedback, peopleãs recollections of judgments they made earlier differ systematically from their actual original judgments: Their recollection judgments are typically closer to the truth than the original judgments have been. It has been proposed that this phenomenon¨the so-called hindsight bias¨may be due to cognitive reconstruction of the prior judgment. We propose a theoretical model of this reconstruction process. The modelãs crucial assumptions are that knowledge is updated after feedback, and that reconstruction is based on the updated knowledge. By using a simple inferential heuristic (Take The Best, Gigerenzer & Goldstein, 1996), this model explains at the level of individual judgments why hindsight bias does or does not occur, and even why it sometimes reverses. Two studies show (a) that knowledge after feedback is indeed systematically shifted toward feedback, (b) that our model accounts for 75 percent of cases in which either hindsight bias or reversed hindsight bias occurred, and (c) that assisting knowledge recall reduces hindsight bias. We conclude that hindsight bias can be seen as a by-product of an adaptive process, namely the updating of knowledge after feedback.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoffrage, Ulrich & Hertwig, Ralph & Gigerenzer, Gerd, 1999. "Hindsight Bias: A By-product of Knowledge Updating," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 99-33, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
  • Handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:99-33
    Note: Financial Support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 504, at the University of Mannheim, is gratefully acknowledged.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:99-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carsten Schmidt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfmande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.