IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/xrs/sfbmaa/07-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why the Euro looked like a price booster: Differential perception of increasing versus decreasing prices

Author

Listed:
  • Greitemeyer, Tobias

    (Sozialpsychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität)

  • Greifeneder, Rainer

    (Sonderforschungsbereich 504)

Abstract

The present research examined whether price trend misperceptions can be explained by the differential perception of increasing versus decreasing prices. We expected price increases (losses to consumers) to be perceived as being more intense than price decreases (gains to consumers) of the same relative magnitude. This tendency, in turn, should be positively associated with price trend judgments. To test this reasoning, participants in the first two studies were asked to compare DM and Euro prices. First, participants received a menu containing 21 dishes with German Mark prices, and their price trend expectations were assessed. Then, participants indicated for each dish to what extent the price trend had changed. Finally, participants’ price trend judgments were assessed. In both studies, results indicate that price trend judgments were biased toward rising prices. In addition, price increases were perceived as rising more than price decreases of the same magnitude were perceived as falling. As expected, this tendency was positively associated with price trend judgments, even after controlling for price trend expectations. Study 3 was to replicate these findings in a different domain to demonstrate the general nature and impact of the hypothesized effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Greitemeyer, Tobias & Greifeneder, Rainer, 2007. "Why the Euro looked like a price booster: Differential perception of increasing versus decreasing prices," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 07-22, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
  • Handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:07-22
    Note: Financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 504, at the University of Mannheim, is gratefully acknowledged.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:07-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carsten Schmidt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfmande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.