IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/xrs/sfbmaa/00-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is the interdependent self a better communicator than the independent self? Self-construal and the observation of conversational norms

Author

Listed:
  • Haberstroh, Susanne

    (Sonderforschungsbereich 504)

  • Kühnen, Ulrich

    (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA)

  • Oyserman, Daphna

    (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA)

  • Schwarz, Norbert

    (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA)

Abstract

Successful communication requires close attention to the common ground of the ongoing conversation. Because attentiveness to others is a self-defining goal within an interdependent construal of self, but less so within an independent construal of self, we expected that self-construal influences the extent to which individuals monitor the common ground and engage in cooperative conversational conduct. To test this hypothesis, participants' temporary self-construal was manipulated through a priming technique. As predicted, interdependence primed participants were more likely than independence primed participants to take the recipient's knowledge into account, avoiding redundant answers in response to partially (Experiment 1) or fully (Experiment 2) redundant questions. This differential conversational conduct resulted in different patterns of self-reports, raising important methodological issues for research that compares responses from groups or cultures with different chronic self-construals.

Suggested Citation

  • Haberstroh, Susanne & Kühnen, Ulrich & Oyserman, Daphna & Schwarz, Norbert, 2000. "Is the interdependent self a better communicator than the independent self? Self-construal and the observation of conversational norms," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 00-18, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
  • Handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:00-18
    Note: Financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 504, at the University of Mannheim, is gratefully acknowledged.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:00-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carsten Schmidt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfmande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.