IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wsr/pbrief/y2021i053.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

America is back. Chancen und Herausforderungen für die multilaterale Zusammenarbeit

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Christen

Abstract

Der vorliegende Beitrag erläutert die globalen handelspolitischen Herausforderungen, die sich im Zuge der Trump-Administration intensiviert und den Stillstand sowie die Interessensgegensätze bei multilateralen Handelsfragen verschärft haben. Mit dem Amtsantritt von Joe Biden sind die Relevanz einer regelbasierten multilateralen Handelsordnung und internationalen Zusammenarbeit wieder in den Vordergrund gerückt. Insbesondere die transatlantische Kooperation bei zentralen Themen im Zuge gemeinsamer Bestrebungen hinsichtlich eines "Renewed Transatlantic Partnership" könnte eine Hebelwirkung entfalten, um die Handels- und Investitionstätigkeiten zu stärken und eine sinnvolle WTO-Reform anzustoßen. Gleichzeitig veranschaulicht Bidens "America is back"-Kurs die Rückkehr der USA auf die internationale Bühne und unterstreicht, dass die internationalen Prioritäten der USA auch multilaterale Kooperationen über die Handelspolitik hinaus beinhalten, wie beispielsweise eine Reform der globalen Unternehmenssteuer, die Aufhebung des Patentschutzes im Sinne der Eindämmung der COVID-19-Pandemie sowie ein gemeinsames Vorgehen gegenüber China und eine Klimakooperation. Dieser Kurswechsel der USA eröffnet weitreichende Chancen für die Intensivierung der internationalen Zusammenarbeit, die langfristig auch zu einem Wiedererstarken der globalen Handelsordnung führen kann.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Christen, 2021. "America is back. Chancen und Herausforderungen für die multilaterale Zusammenarbeit," FIW Policy Brief series 053, FIW.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsr:pbrief:y:2021:i:053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fiw.ac.at/fileadmin/Documents/Publikationen/Policy_Briefs/53_FIW_Policy_Brief_Christen_America_is_back.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: none
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raza, Werner G., 2021. "COVID-19 und das Versagen pharmazeutischer Innovation für den globalen Süden: Das Beispiel der "vernachlässigten Krankheiten" und der Neuen Infektionskrankheiten," Briefing Papers 32, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    2. Lisandra Flach, 2021. "Die EU braucht eine klare USA-China-Strategie [The EU needs a clear US-China strategy]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(4), pages 238-239, April.
    3. Herbert Zech & Stefan Wagner & Thomas Fackler & Reto M. Hilty & Iris Plöger & Michael Stolpe, 2021. "Patent Protection: Stimulus for Innovation or Hindrance to Production?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 74(08), pages 03-20, August.
    4. Gabriel Felbermayr & Marina Steininger & Erdal Yalcin, 2017. "Global Impact of a Protectionist U.S. Trade Policy," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 89.
    5. Jürgen Matthes, 2021. "How to Unlock the WTO Blockage and Why China Holds the Key," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 22(02), pages 17-21, March.
    6. Martin Klein, 2020. "WTO-Reform: Formale Regelgleichheit reicht nicht aus, alle Mitgliedsländer brauchen gleiche wirtschaftliche Chancen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(5), pages 315-320, May.
    7. Lisandra Flach, 2021. "Recent Challenges for Global Cooperation and the Future of WTO," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 22(02), pages 08-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kroll, Henning & Berghäuser, Hendrik & Blind, Knut & Neuhäusler, Peter & Scheifele, Fabian & Thielmann, Axel & Wydra, Sven, 2022. "Schlüsseltechnologien," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 7-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    2. Bofinger, Peter & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Wieland, Volker, 2018. "Vor wichtigen wirtschaftspolitischen Weichenstellungen. Jahresgutachten 2018/19 [Setting the Right Course for Economic Policy. Annual Report 2018/19]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201819.
    3. Raphael Auer & Barthélémy Bonadio & Andrei A Levchenko, 2018. "The economics of revoking NAFTA," BIS Working Papers 739, Bank for International Settlements.
    4. Raphael A. Auer & Barthélémy Bonadio & Andrei A. Levchenko, 2020. "The Economics and Politics of Revoking NAFTA," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 68(1), pages 230-267, March.
    5. Galina Kolev & Jürgen Matthes, 2021. "Protektionismus und Abschottungstendenzen bremsen und verändern die Globalisierung," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(11), pages 845-849, November.
    6. Li, Chunding & Whalley, John, 2021. "Trade protectionism and US manufacturing employment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 353-361.
    7. Walter, Timo, 2018. "Trade and welfare effects of a potential free trade agreement between Japan and the United States," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 16-2018, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    8. Erdal Yalcin & Marina Steininger, 2018. "Worldwide Economic Impact of Increasingly Protectionist US Trade Policy," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(04), pages 30-38, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU; USA; Welthandelsorganisation (WTO); Handelspolitik; plurilaterale Kooperation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsr:pbrief:y:2021:i:053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.