IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpmh/0402001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modos de Pensamiento en Economía: Pensamiento Único vs. Pensamiento en Dow

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge García-Arias

    (University of Leon, Spain)

Abstract

En este trabajo se presenta la Teoría de los Modos de Pensamiento desarrollada por Sheila Dow y se emplea la misma para realizar un recorrido por cuatro corrientes de pensamiento diferentes en Economía. En concreto, se pone de manifiesto como uno de los elementos diferenciales entre las mismas es de naturaleza metodológica: el hecho de que se sustentan en el empleo de un Modo de Pensamiento Babilónico/Estoico (MPB/E) o de un Modo de Pensamiento Cartesiano/Euclídeo (MPC/E). Esta diferencia metodológica permite entender una parte sustantiva del desencuentro existente entre las diferentes corrientes de pensamiento que cohabitan en Economía. De forma añadida, se demuestra la inexistencia de un “pensamiento único” en Economía y se constata la presencia de disensos fundamentales en el pensamiento económico actual.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge García-Arias, 2004. "Modos de Pensamiento en Economía: Pensamiento Único vs. Pensamiento en Dow," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 0402001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmh:0402001
    Note: Type of Document - pdf; prepared on Win98; to print on laserjet; pages: 110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mhet/papers/0402/0402001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    metodología económica; corriente principal; corrientes alternativas; pensamiento heterodoxo;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmh:0402001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.