IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpma/0505023.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Making The Pact More Flexible: Can It Lead to Less Flexible Fiscal Policies?

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Mackiewicz

Abstract

One of the most often discussed features of the Stability and Growth Pact is the rigidity of its 3% deficit rule. In the recent time several reform proposals aim at alleviating the rule in order to allow more room for the automatic stabilizers to operate. As the 3% limit became in the recent years the only binding (at least partially) rule of the Pact’s framework, such a reform is likely to cause even further deterioration of the member countries’ fiscal balances. The empirical evidence presented in the paper shows that in the past lowering the structural budget surplus had a strong negative impact on a degree of anti-cyclical fiscal stabilization. This, in turn, suggests that the Pact’s reform, through higher structural deficits, is likely to decrease, rather then increase, the scope of anti-cyclical fiscal actions undertaken by the EMU member countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Mackiewicz, 2005. "Making The Pact More Flexible: Can It Lead to Less Flexible Fiscal Policies?," Macroeconomics 0505023, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0505023
    Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mac/papers/0505/0505023.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fiscal policy; stabilization policy; fiscal rules; Stability and Growth Pact;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E60 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General
    • E63 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Stabilization; Treasury Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0505023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.