Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Comments on job market models

Contents:

Author Info

  • Daniel Badagnani

    (Instituto Balseiro)

Abstract

We point out that the condition of maximization of the benefit is not Y'(n)=w in general, due to the eventual dependence of the salary w on the employement n. We show that in keynessian models, where the relation between w and n is given, we need to correct the relation between the salary and rent, but in classical models, where we use the benefit to find a demand function, the maximization of the benefit do not permit it. This is a case in wich, regardless the interplay between offer and demand is present, the price and level of interchange of a good (human work) cannot be determined by the intersection of offer and demand functions.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://128.118.178.162/eps/mac/papers/0207/0207004.tex
Download Restriction: no

File URL: http://128.118.178.162/eps/mac/papers/0207/0207004.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: http://128.118.178.162/eps/mac/papers/0207/0207004.ps.gz
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Macroeconomics with number 0207004.

as in new window
Length: 4 pages
Date of creation: 06 Jul 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0207004

Note: Type of Document - LaTeX; prepared on IBM PC; to print on PostScript (first compile with LaTeX); pages: 4 ; figures: None. Here we show that the simplest classical model for the job market is mathematically wrong.
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://128.118.178.162

Related research

Keywords: inconsistency of the classical model; general macroeconomy;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0207004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.