IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpla/0410004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Workers Compensation and Occupational Health and Safety Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Productivity Commission

Abstract

The final report of the public inquiry, National Workers' Compensation and Occupational Health and Safety Frameworks. Consistent with its terms of reference, the Commission had recommended a national workers’ compensation scheme to operate alongside those of the States and Territories to directly address the compliance burdens, costs and inefficiencies multi-state employers face in complying with the schemes of each jurisdiction, and a uniform OHS regime based on the existing cooperative national institutional structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Productivity Commission, 2004. "Workers Compensation and Occupational Health and Safety Frameworks," Labor and Demography 0410004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpla:0410004
    Note: Type of Document - pdf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/lab/papers/0410/0410004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samineh Sanatkar & Jenn Bartlett & Samuel Harvey & Isabelle Counson & David Lawrence, 2022. "The Influence of Stigma Perceptions on Employees’ Claims Experiences for Psychological Injuries: Re-Examination of a Cross-Sectional Survey among Australian Police and Emergency Service Personnel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Productivity Commission, 2009. "Performance Benchmarking of Australian and New Zealand Business Regulation - Food Safety," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 38.
    3. Robert Dixon & John Freebairn, 2009. "Models of Labour Services and Estimates of Australian Productivity," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 42(2), pages 131-142, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpla:0410004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.