Refuting the Trade Deficit Rationale
AbstractThis article provides a defense of a sentence lifted from the Final Report of the United States Trade Deficit Review Commission. 'The savings shortfall argument falsely presumes that causation goes from savings to the trade deficit'. The savings shortfall argument is support by nothing more than reasoning by analogy from the pre-trade closed economy. The equation Savings equal Investment plus the Trade Deficit cannot be reasonably interprepted as a closed system. Factors outside this equation control the level of both investment and the trade deficit. I support my position by reviewiing in detail the way the Capital Account is calculated, to show that the Current Account Balance controls the level of the Capital Account. I also review the role of the stock market in transferring wealth from the business sector to the personal sector, effectively making irrelevant the low level of savings as reported by the National Income and Product Accounts.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by EconWPA in its series International Trade with number 0407012.
Length: 12 pages
Date of creation: 26 Jul 2004
Date of revision:
Note: Type of Document - doc; pages: 12 . A polemic
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://188.8.131.52
Savings; Trade Deficit; Pre-trade economy; Closed System; Capital Account; Current Account; Financial Flows;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- F1 - International Economics - - Trade
- F2 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.