Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Bureaucratic limits of firm size: Practitioner's summary

Contents:

Author Info

  • Staffan Canback

    (Henley Management College)

Abstract

The research tests Oliver Williamson’s proposition that transaction cost economics can explain the limits of firm size. Williamson suggests that diseconomies of scale are manifested through four interrelated factors: atmospheric consequences due to specialisation, bureaucratic insularity, incentive limits of the employment relation and communication distortion due to bounded rationality. Furthermore, Williamson argues that diseconomies of scale are counteracted by economies of scale and can be moderated by adoption of the multidivisional organisation form and by high internal asset specificity. Combined, these influences tend to cancel out and thus there is not a strong, directly observable, relationship between a large firm’s size and performance. A review of the relevant literature, including transaction cost economics, sociological studies of bureaucracy, information-processing perspectives on the firm, agency theory, and studies of incentives and motivation within firms, as well as empirical studies of trends in firm size and industry concentration, corroborates Williamson’s theoretical framework and translates it into five hypotheses: (1) Bureaucratic failure, in the form of atmospheric consequences, bureaucratic insularity, incentive limits and communication distortion, increases with firm size; (2) Large firms exhibit economies of scale; (3) Diseconomies of scale from bureaucratic failure have a negative impact on firm performance; (4) Economies of scale increase the relative profitability of large firms over smaller firms; and (5) Diseconomies of scale are moderated by two transaction cost-related factors: organisation form and asset specificity. The hypotheses are tested by applying structural equation models to primary and secondary cross-sectional data from 784 large U.S. manufacturing firms. The statistical analyses confirm the hypotheses. Thus, diseconomies of scale influence the growth and profitability of firms negatively, while economies of scale and the moderating factors have positive influences. This implies that executives and directors of large firms should pay attention to bureaucratic failure.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://128.118.178.162/eps/io/papers/0311/0311001.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Industrial Organization with number 0311001.

as in new window
Length: 5 pages
Date of creation: 10 Nov 2003
Date of revision: 03 Jun 2005
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpio:0311001

Note: Type of Document - pdf; prepared on WinXP; pages: 5; figures: included
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://128.118.178.162

Related research

Keywords: bureaucratic failure; diseconomies of scale; transaction cost economics;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Biased towards bosses
    by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2012-01-08 11:46:16
  2. Arguing for co-ops I: growth
    by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2008-10-05 10:21:19
  3. The utopia of better government
    by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2008-01-09 12:44:06
  4. Skype's lessons
    by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2007-10-02 10:15:12
  5. Jag for sale: three questions
    by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2007-06-12 13:53:03
  6. Defending left-libertarianism
    by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2012-11-15 11:40:20
  7. The management question
    by ? in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2013-09-10 13:49:00

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpio:0311001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.