Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The Relationship of Self-rated Vision and Hearing to Functional Status and Well-being Among Seniors 70 Years and Older

Contents:

Author Info

  • Paul Lee

    (RAND)

  • James P. Smith

    (RAND)

  • Raynard Kington

    (RAND)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the relationship between self-reported visual and hearing impairment and an index of global functional status among seniors age 70 years or older. METHODS: A total of 7,320 United States community-dwelling persons aged 70 years or older participating in the 1993 Assets and Health Dynamics of the Oldest Old Survey (AHEAD) completed detailed questionnaires about their demographic, socioeconomic, and health status. Multivariate analyses of functional status (using a global index of functional status based on self-reported limitations in 11 activities) were conducted, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic status and common medical conditions, as well as independently for hearing and vision. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 27% rated their vision as fair or poor, whereas 25% rated their hearing as fair or poor. Controlling for demographic factors, socioeconomic status, medical conditions, and general health status, limitations in both vision and hearing correlated independently with worsened functional status. Controlling for income, wealth, and education did not greatly reduce the strength of the association between visual and hearing impairment and function. CONCLUSIONS: Visual and hearing impairment appear to have a significant relationship to overall functioning in the oldest old, regardless of income or wealth. By confirming these findings across income and household wealth groups, adjusted for medical conditions and general health status, in a nationally representative population of Americans age 70 years or older, this study provides a powerful added impetus to efforts for improving vision and hearing for all other Americans, including the oldest old.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://128.118.178.162/eps/hew/papers/0402/0402003.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by EconWPA in its series HEW with number 0402003.

as in new window
Length: 6 pages
Date of creation: 20 Feb 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwphe:0402003

Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 6. American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 127, No. 4, April 1999, pp. 447-452
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://128.118.178.162

Related research

Keywords:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwphe:0402003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.