Verbesserung der Vergleichbarkeit von Schätzgüteergebnissen von Insolvenzprognosestudien (German version of 'Improving the comparability of insolvency predictions')
AbstractThis working paper aims at improving the comparability of forecast quality measures of insolvency prediction studies. For this purpose, in a first step commonly used accuracy measures for categorial, ordinal and cardinal insolvency predictions are presented. It will be argued, that ordinal measures are the most suitable measures for sample spanning comparisons concerning predictive power of rating models, as they are not affected by sample default rates. A method for transforming cardinal into ordinal accuracy measures is presented, by which comparisons of insolvency prediction results of older and present-day studies are enabled. In the second part of the working paper an overview of influencing variables – aside from the quality of the insolvency prediction methods – is given, which affect the accuracy measures presented in the first part of the paper and thus impair sample spanning comparison of empirically obtained forecast quality results. In this context, methods for evaluating information losses that are attributable to the discretization of continuous rating scales or preselection of portfolios are developed. Measure results of various insolvency prognosis studies are envisaged and compared with three benchmarks. First benchmark is the accuracy that can be achieved solely by taking into account legal status and industry classification of corporations. The second benchmark is the univariate prognosis accuracy of single financial ratios. As third benchmark, ALTMAN’s Zscore model is examined, a multivariate insolvency prediction model, that is currently used as reference rating model in many empirical studies. It turns out, however, that the Z-score’s forecast quality is so discontenting, that its application is not recommendable. Instead it is suggested to use those rating models that are cited in this discussion paper, which are fully documented and which therefore can be rebuilt and directly applied to any desired data sample. If applied to the respective target groups, their performance matches with the performance of commercial rating systems, like bureau and business scores for rather small companies, middle market rating models for SMB, or agency ratings for large public companies.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by EconWPA in its series Finance with number 0507007.
Length: 150 pages
Date of creation: 06 Jul 2005
Date of revision:
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 150. This document is in German. There is an English version available ('Improving the comparability of insolvency predictions').
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://188.8.131.52
financial ratio analysis; corporate bankruptcy prediction; forecast validation; accuracy ratio; information entropy; sample selection; rating granularity;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
- C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading lists or Wikipedia pages:
- Schätzgütemaße für ordinale Insolvenzprognosen in Wikipedia German ne '')
- Schätzgütemaße für kardinale Insolvenzprognosen in Wikipedia German ne '')
- Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/22. September 2008 in Wikipedia German ne '')
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.