IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/safiwp/95-09-075.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Model Misspecification Tests, Model Building, and Predictability in Complex Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Radu Manuca
  • Robert Savit

Abstract

In this paper we show that significant advantages can be realized by using functions of simple variables, such as time lags, as directions in reconstruction spaces for complicated time series. First, we show that more sensitive model specification tests can be constructed when the candidate model is used as one of the directions in the reconstruction space. This naturally results in misspecification tests based on the construction of conditional probabilities which can reveal misspecified models even when other powerful methods, such as the BDS test applied to a sequence of residuals, fails. Second, we show that model building and predictability of the time series can be substantially improved by using an informational criterion to determine the functions with which to associate the directions of the reconstruction space. This criterion is of the form of a conditional probability and is related to a measure of the short term predictability of the time series. We consider specifically an example in which the search space of functions islinear combinations of time-lags, and we compare the resulting model with linear least squares fit to the daa. We also show that this optimized reconstruction space can improve longer-term predictability. We demonstrate this by comparing longer-term predictions made using the optimized spae with predictions made using a simple time-lagged reconstruction space.

Suggested Citation

  • Radu Manuca & Robert Savit, 1995. "Model Misspecification Tests, Model Building, and Predictability in Complex Systems," Working Papers 95-09-075, Santa Fe Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:safiwp:95-09-075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:safiwp:95-09-075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/epstfus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.