IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/safire/97-06-052e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Complexity: A Philosopher's Reflections

Author

Listed:
  • Lee McIntyre

Abstract

It is sometimes thought that philosophers have little to offer those who think about the science of complex systems. There are, however, two philosophical ideas that seem crucial in considering the very definition of complexity. The first is the distinction between "ontology" and "epistemology", wherein one recognizes the difference between limits provided by reality versus those provided by our knowledge of reality. The second concerns the debate over "non-reductive materialism" in the philosophy of mind, wherein philosophers have discovered a way to defend non-reductive explanations of emergent phenomena, even though they are materially dependent upon causal relations at lower levels. In my paper, I argue that we may defend the science of complex systems as a project involving the explanation of non-reductive phenomena that are epistemically emergent.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee McIntyre, 1997. "Complexity: A Philosopher's Reflections," Research in Economics 97-06-052e, Santa Fe Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:wop:safire:97-06-052e
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiazhe Sun & Kaizhong Yang, 2016. "The Wicked Problem of Climate Change: A New Approach Based on Social Mess and Fragmentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:safire:97-06-052e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/epstfus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.