IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/pennin/01-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Another View of Predatory Lending

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Guttentag

Abstract

Virtually all the analysis of predatory lending in the home loan market has been based on a dual-market paradigm. Sub-prime borrowers, usually less-sophisticated, lower-income, and disproportionately minority, are preyed upon. Other borrowers are not preyed upon, or if they are, it doesn't matter. The dual-market paradigm has conditioned the remedies proposed for predatory lending. Since sub-prime borrowers can't take care of themselves in the marketplace, government needs to help them by curtailing contractual options, setting price limits, mandating counseling, and the like. These "remedies" impose heavy costs on the system and remove options from the borrowers they are supposed to help. This paper presents a single-market paradigm of market failure. It argues that market failure is pervasive, and presents some new data that support this view. The core reason for market failure is that effective shopping for a mortgage is extraordinarily difficult for even sophisticated borrowers. The effective remedy is to make mortgage shopping unnecessary. Eliminating the causes of market failure would eliminate predatory lending. Mortgage shopping is a highly-skilled professional service that should be purchasable in the market. I call the professionals providing this service "Upfront Mortgage Brokers" (UMBs), to distinguish them from conventional mortgage brokers who contribute to the problem. UMBs act as agents of the borrower in shopping for a mortgage, are paid a negotiated fee for their services, and disclose and pass through the prices they receive from lenders. In contrast, conventional mortgage brokers are independent contractors who mark up the prices they receive from lenders, which they do not disclose. The global remedy to predatory lending is to require by law that all mortgage brokers operate as UMBs. Then borrowers would shop for mortgage brokers, not for mortgages, and need concern themselves only with price, quality and referrals -- the same factors they look at when hiring a house painter or an electrician. Predatory lending would then disappear. A voluntary association of UMBs, initiated by the writer, already exists. These UMBs are listed on my web site (www.mtgprofessor.com), through which they receive clients. While they comprise a tiny segment of the market, that segment works as competitive markets should. These brokers pass through the competitive wholesale prices they receive from lenders, while borrowers shop the brokers based on price and reputation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Guttentag, 2001. "Another View of Predatory Lending," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 01-23, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:pennin:01-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/01/0123.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:pennin:01-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fiupaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.