IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/98-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lawyers and Their Discontents: Findings from a Survey of the Chicago Bar

Author

Listed:
  • John P. Heinz
  • Kathleen E. Hull
  • Ava A. Harter

Abstract

Both journalists and scholars have reported that many lawyers are acutely unhappy with their careers. Evidence from a survey of a large random sample of Chicago lawyers, however, is inconsistent with these reports. About 800 lawyers were personally interviewed in 1994-95. Only 1.6% of the respondents reported that they were "very dissatisfied" with their jobs, while 84% said that they were "satisfied" or "very satisfied." Male and female lawyers did not differ significantly in these overall satisfaction ratings. Although these findings are consistent with research on occupational satisfaction generally, the lack of a gender difference is surprising because the circumstances of women within the legal profession are, on average, markedly less advantageous than those of men. In more particular aspects of job satisfaction, however, women are often significantly more dissatisfied than men. Family circumstances, especially for lawyers who have children, have more impact on women than on men, as both the literature and general knowledge would lead one to expect. African-American respondents were significantly more dissatisfied than whites. Some of this difference may be associated with characteristics of the settings within which the lawyers work, including a large income difference. In multivariate analyses, only income and practice setting were found to be significantly associated with lawyer job satisfaction--neither gender nor race was significant in these analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • John P. Heinz & Kathleen E. Hull & Ava A. Harter, "undated". "Lawyers and Their Discontents: Findings from a Survey of the Chicago Bar," IPR working papers 98-6, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:98-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markovic, Milan & Plickert, Gabriele, 2019. "The paradox of minority attorney satisfaction," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:98-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.