IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/98-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutionalizing the Recycling Movement: The Structuring of Dialogue in the Solid Waste Field

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Lounsbury
  • Paul Hirsch
  • Marc Ventresca

Abstract

Curbside recycling programs grew fivefold betweeen 1988 and 1995, yet recycling as practical activity is contested on both ecological and economic criteria. This paper develops arguments at the intersection of organizational and social movements analysis to develop understanding of how broader social processes enable the diffusion of ecologically sustainable practices. Through historical analysis of key actors and systematic tracking of expert discourse changes, we provide evidence of how recycling advocacy and the solid waste field co-evolved. We argue that the proliferation of curbside recycling programs and practices in the United States was influenced by contention and change in the solid waste field, the formalization of recycling advocacy into a social movement organization, and the social legitimation of recycling as a solid waste model. We discuss the implications of these findings for public policy formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Lounsbury & Paul Hirsch & Marc Ventresca, "undated". "Institutionalizing the Recycling Movement: The Structuring of Dialogue in the Solid Waste Field," IPR working papers 98-17, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:98-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:98-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.