IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/97-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, the Institutional Construction of Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women

Author

Listed:
  • Robert L. Nelson
  • William P. Bridges

Abstract

This paper is the concluding chapter of a book that analyzes the relationship between markets, organizations, and sex-based wage inequality. The cornerstone of the analysis is a set of four case studies of organizations that were sued for sex discrimination in pay, and which included data on between-job wage differences. Here we summarize the results and discuss the implications for theory, policy, and law. The empirical results lend support to an organizational inequality model of gender-based pay differences. Despite significant differences across organizational settings and between the public and the private sector, we find that large organizations mediate between market prices and internal pay levels in ways that contribute to gender-based pay inequality. The findings have significant policy implications. We suggest that neither the free market nor comparable worth will achieve gender inequality in pay without serious disadvantages. After discussing the experience of various attempts at reform, we propose several changes in law and regulation that will encourage organizations to adopt pay practices that are more rational and fair. Finally, we assert that the fate of the cases we studied reveals the limitations of the law as a vehicle for redressing gender inequality in American society. Plaintiffs made a critical error when they attacked between-job wage differences on the basis that the market discriminated against women, for they posed a false dichotomy between the market and antidiscrimination. But the courts also failed to deal with the issue adequately. After recognizing in principle that between-job wage differences could constitute sex discrimination under Title VII, they then consistently adopted the position that the market, rather than employer practices, was the source of such wage differences. The courts thus gave legal authority to one side of an empirical debate and effectively legalized a fundamental aspect of gender inequality in the American occupational system.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert L. Nelson & William P. Bridges, "undated". "Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, the Institutional Construction of Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women," IPR working papers 97-16, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:97-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:97-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.