IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/mitccs/195.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lexical and Sequential Variety in Organizational Processes: Some Preliminary Findings and Propositions

Author

Listed:
  • Brian T. Pentland
  • Malu Roldan
  • Ahmed A. Shabana
  • Louise L. Soe
  • Sidne G. Ward

Abstract

Routineness is a central concepts in organizational theory and design and is widely understood as a product of low task variety and high task analyzability. Standardized scales to measure these dimensions been developed and shown to be reliable, but preliminary results reported here suggest the possibility that these scales may measure routineness in the content of a task unit's work but not variety in the process. Comparing results from the standard measures and detailed observational studies in three task units, we discovered that work processes in the most "routinized" task units (as measured by the standard scales) are more varied than in the less "routinized" task unit. To help explain these findings, we introduce and operationalize the concepts of lexical and sequential variety and use them to formulate testable propositions. We also discuss the implications of this alternative view of routines and routineness for issues such as organizaitonal learning, process redesign, and mass customization.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian T. Pentland & Malu Roldan & Ahmed A. Shabana & Louise L. Soe & Sidne G. Ward, 1996. "Lexical and Sequential Variety in Organizational Processes: Some Preliminary Findings and Propositions," Working Paper Series 195, MIT Center for Coordination Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:wop:mitccs:195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ccs.mit.edu/papers/CCSWP195/CCSWP195.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandr Knobel, 2010. "Factors of important Tariff Information," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 143P.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:mitccs:195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ccs.mit.edu/wpmenu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.