IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/jopovw/68.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Should We Have Faith in the Churches? Ten-Point Coalition's Effect on Boston's Youth Violence

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny Berrien
  • Christopher Winship

Abstract

The Boston story is similar to that of other cities but is unusual in two important respects. First, the drop in the homicide rate between 1990 and 1996 has been the sharpest in the nation. Perhaps even more impressive, for the 29-month period ending in January 1998, Boston had no teenage homicide victims. Since that time there have been four. This paper addresses the question of whether or not a group of ministers, the Ten-Point Coalition, has in fact played a significant role in the reduction of youth violence in Boston. Our analysis has several goals. First and most important, we want to establish that the Ten-Point Coalition has been critical to the reduction of youth violence in Boston. We plan to conduct the further research needed to firmly establish the validity of this claim. Second, we will analyze why it has been difficult for police departments to effectively reduce violence. We will argue more generally, that any police action in the inner city is inherently problematic. Our third goal is to suggest what types of policies are likely to be effective in reducing youth violence in the inner city over the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny Berrien & Christopher Winship, 1999. "Should We Have Faith in the Churches? Ten-Point Coalition's Effect on Boston's Youth Violence," JCPR Working Papers 68, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:jopovw:68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:jopovw:68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/jcuchus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.