Axel Leijonhufvud (Center for Computable Economics)
Abstract
The complaints about today's macroeconomics are familiar to all. The economy is not modelled as an evolving system exhibiting emergent properties. Behavior is represented as precalculatedly optimal rather than adaptive. Actions are assumed to be prereconciled by rational expectations rather that brought into consistency by market interaction. Heterogeneity of goods or of agents is all but completely denied. The infinite horizon optimizing representative agent model is not altogether representative of today's macroeconomics. We also have models with two types of mortal agents (overlapping generations) and some models with asymmetric information or externalities capable of producing coordination failures of a sort. But generally speaking these too tend to be subject to the same complaints. A overview of today's macroeconomics for a Santa Fé audience might only too easily deteriorate into a catalogue of models to which these complaints and reservations apply in varying combinations. Rather than tire you with such a litany, I will describe a set of (somewhat atypical) empirical phenomena, explain why I do not think they are handled well by current macroeconomics, and end with a few suggestions about how they might be attacked. If these suggestions were to start a critical discussion, I would find that helpful.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of California at Los Angeles, Center for Computable Economics in its series Working Papers with number
_013.