Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Strong Growth, Driven by Exports in the NMS and by Consumption in the Future EU Members


Author Info

  • Vasily Astrov

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Vladimir Gligorov

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Peter Havlik

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Mario Holzner

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Gabor Hunya

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Michael Landesmann

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Zdenek Lukas
  • Anton Mihailov
  • Leon Podkaminer

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Josef Pöschl
  • Sandor Richter

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Waltraut Urban
  • Hermine Vidovic

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Julia Wörz


In 2005 most of the new EU member states (NMS) performed even better than in 2004. They have successfully managed the accession to the EU and gained the ability to grow fast despite the anaemic performance of the old EU. FDI inflows reached a record high. In the coming two years, economic prospects for the NMS are fairly good, even if growth in the old EU remains unimpressive and prices of energy stay high. By 2007 higher EU transfers should be allowing for a significant expansion of investment. The positive contribution of net exports to GDP growth is expected to continue in 2006-2007. Besides, rising private consumption and investment should be playing a stronger role than in 2005. With continuing appreciation of the domestic currencies, the exchange-rate adjusted unit labour costs are growing, as yet without adversely affecting exports. This is a sign of success of the ongoing restructuring of the industrial sector. Interestingly, employment, also in industry, rose in 2005 (except in Hungary). Inflation slowed down to very low levels and is no longer a serious problem. Hungary and Slovakia will have to start consolidating their public finances. In both countries the consolidations may be postponed to 2007 for political reasons. In Southeast Europe, growth has on average remained strong, though it has come down in Romania and Serbia. Rising consumption was the main contributor to GDP growth in this region. That was partly the consequence of the increased soundness of the banking system, but also of the improved expectations of growth in the short and medium term. In the next two years growth should continue, though the volatility is still significant and there are also short-term policy measures that could slow down the recovery. An expectation is that significant inflows of foreign investments will start to translate into growing industrial production, which has been lagging behind in the past. Also, employment is still declining, though unemployment rates have stabilized. Exports of goods and services grew strongly throughout the region, while imports expanded even faster in Romania, Bulgaria and Albania. Price stability and fiscal balance have mostly been preserved, except in the case of Serbia, which has seen accelerating inflation, and Romania, where disinflation has been interrupted. The downside to that is a growing concern that credit expansion is threatening the external balance and price stability. Thus, the region is still facing policy challenges and that adds to the volatility rather than sustainability of its growth prospects. Russia's GDP increased by about 6% in 2005. The main driver of growth was rising domestic demand while the contribution of real net exports to GDP growth was again negative. The pace of structural reforms has slowed down substantially and state interventions in the economy are increasing. GDP growth of about 6% is forecast for the coming years, disinflation will be slow. Sustainable and broader-based long-term growth would require more investment and economic restructuring. The slowdown of economic growth in Ukraine has been spectacular, reflecting weak investment demand and the deterioration of foreign trade. By and large, the country's economy remains hostage to the political uncertainty ahead of the parliamentary elections in March 2006. In China, GDP grew by nearly 10% driven by both external and domestic demand. A slight growth deceleration is expected for 2006-2007 as the government intends to slow down investment expansion and as exports of some products to the USA and the EU will be restricted.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
File Function: Order URL / Description
Download Restriction: Only to order

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw in its series wiiw Research Reports with number 325.

as in new window
Length: 116 pages including 47 Tables and 21 Figures
Date of creation: Feb 2006
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published as wiiw Research Report
Handle: RePEc:wii:rpaper:rr:325

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Rahlgasse 3, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: (+43-1) 533 66 10
Fax: (+43-1) 533 66 10-50
Web page:
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:

Related research

Keywords: Central and East European new EU member states; Southeast Europe; Balkans; former Soviet Union; China; Turkey; GDP; industry; productivity; foreign trade; exchange rates; inflation; fiscal deficits; trade; ERM II;

Find related papers by JEL classification:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Brandmeier, Michael, 2006. "Reasons for real appreciation in Central Europe," Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers 55, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
  2. Brandmeier, Michael, 2006. "Reasons for real appreciation in Central Europe," Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers 55, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wii:rpaper:rr:325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Customer service).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.