This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Name Game. Notes on the Choice of Methods in Ranking Institutes

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Peter Huber (WIFO)
Angelina Keil (WIFO)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Two recent studies published in "Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik" are used to discuss methods to develop bibliometric analyses and rankings of economic research institutions. According to them, standardisation methods using the number of staff or university graduates may have a crucial impact on results, especially when the weighting methods used are not sufficiently selective. Different methods to prepare the database also have considerable influence on the data quality and results. Rankings based on a variety of methods for weighting the quality are frequently highly correlated with each other, but they supply quite different placements for institutes.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/jsp/index.jsp?fid=23923&id=28061&typeid=8&display_mode=2&pub_language=2&language=2
File Format: text/html
File Function: Abstract
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/servlet/wwa.upload.DownloadServlet/bdoc/PRIVATE33047/WP_2007_287$.PDF
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: full text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by WIFO in its series WIFO Working Papers with number 287.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: 16 Jan 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wfo:wpaper:y:2007:i:287

Contact details of provider:
Postal: A-1103 Wien, Postfach 91
Phone: (+43 1) 798 26 01-0
Fax: (+43 1) 798 93 86
Web page: http://www.wifo.ac.at/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ilse Schulz).

Related research
Keywords: Rankings Publikationstätigkeit empirische Wirtschaftsforschungsinstitute;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Michel Lubrano & Luc Bauwens & Alan Kirman & Camelia Protopopescu, 2003. "Ranking Economics Departments in Europe: A Statistical Approach," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(6), pages 1367-1401, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. Michael Bräninger & Justus Haucap, 2001. "Was Ökonomen lesen und schätzen: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 185-210, 05. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also indexes book chapters.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-12.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.