Reform is often flawed by delayed implementation and, after initial acceptance, sudden reversals in public reaction. In recent years, many attribute these delays and reversals to reform dynamics because reform, particularly when comprehensive, rarely takes place all at once. In designing reform, it is important to determine what the best sequencing of reform would be, under what conditions that sequence is feasible, and how expectations will affect the success of alternative reform strategies. In the literature on second-best reform strategies, misperceptions about the prospective costs and benefits of reform add another intertemporal distortion to the many already identified. Bold moves, such as pre-announced institutional changes, are often suggested as a way to signal the beginning of a new policy regime. The author advocates a more cautious approach when a government has been discredited by a history of policy failures.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.