IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/7611.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Robustness of shared prosperity estimates : how different methodological choices matter

Author

Listed:
  • Atamanov,Aziz
  • Wieser,Christina
  • Uematsu,Hiroki
  • Yoshida,Nobuo
  • Nguyen,Minh Cong
  • Azevedo,Joao Pedro Wagner De
  • Dewina,Reno

Abstract

This paper is the first to systematically test the robustness of shared prosperity estimates to different methodological choices using a sample of countries from all regions in the world. The tests that are conducted include grouped versus microdata, nominal welfare aggregate versus adjustment for spatial price variation, and different treatment of income with negative and zero values. The empirical results reveal an only minimal impact of the proposed tests on shared prosperity estimates. Nevertheless, there are important caveats. First, spatial adjustment can change the ranking of households, affecting the distribution of the population in the bottom 40 percent. Second, the negligible impact of spatial deflation holds only if price adjustments are carried out consistently over time. Finally, the treatment of negative and zero income numbers can potentially lead to substantial differences in shared prosperity, depending on the magnitude of negative income and the share of households with negative and zero numbers across years.

Suggested Citation

  • Atamanov,Aziz & Wieser,Christina & Uematsu,Hiroki & Yoshida,Nobuo & Nguyen,Minh Cong & Azevedo,Joao Pedro Wagner De & Dewina,Reno, 2016. "Robustness of shared prosperity estimates : how different methodological choices matter," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7611, The World Bank.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:7611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/115091467995076080/pdf/WPS7611.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Atamanov, Aziz & Tandon, Sharad & Lopez-Acevedo, Gladys & Vergara Bahena, Mexico Alberto, 2020. "Measuring Monetary Poverty in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: Data Gaps and Different Options to Address Them," IZA Discussion Papers 13363, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Kilic,Talip & Serajuddin,Umar & Uematsu,Hiroki & Yoshida,Nobuo & Kilic,Talip & Serajuddin,Umar & Uematsu,Hiroki & Yoshida,Nobuo, 2017. "Costing household surveys for monitoring progress toward ending extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7951, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:7611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.