Russian trade and foreign direct investment policy at the crossroads
AbstractThis paper summarizes the estimates of what Russia will get from World Trade Organization accession and why. A key finding is the estimate that Russia will gain about $53 billion per year in the medium term from World Trade Organization accession and $177 billion per year in the long term, due largely to its own commitments to reform its own business services sectors. The paper summarizes the principal reform commitments that Russia has undertaken as part of its World Trade Organization accession negotiations, and compares them with those of other countries that have acceded to the World Trade Organization. It finds that the Russian commitments represent a liberal offer to the members of the World Trade Organization for admission, but they are typical of other transition countries that have acceded to the World Trade Organization. The authors discuss the outstanding issues in the Russian World Trade Organizaiton accession negotiations, and explain why Russian accession will result in the elimination of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment against Russia. They discuss Russian policies to attract foreign direct investment, including an assessment of the impact of the 2008 law on strategic sectors and the increased role of the state in the economy. Finally, the authors assess the importance of Russian accession to Russia and to the international trading community, and suggestions for most efficiently meeting the government’s diversification objective.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 5255.
Date of creation: 01 Mar 2010
Date of revision:
Economic Theory&Research; World Trade Organization; Emerging Markets; Debt Markets; Free Trade;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2010-04-11 (All new papers)
- NEP-CIS-2010-04-11 (Confederation of Independent States)
- NEP-INT-2010-04-11 (International Trade)
- NEP-TRA-2010-04-11 (Transition Economics)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
Blog mentionsAs found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
- Путин vs. время
by (author unknown) in ДНЕВНИК ЭКОНОМИСТА on 2011-04-10 11:58:12
- Возвращение "Боржоми"
by (author unknown) in ДНЕВНИК ЭКОНОМИСТА on 2010-10-25 12:08:06
- В то ВТО
by (author unknown) in ДНЕВНИК ЭКОНОМИСТА on 2010-10-03 19:56:37
- ????? ?????? ?? ?????
by (author unknown) in ДНЕВНИК ЭКОНОМИСТА on 2012-09-03 04:10:40
- World Bank, 2011. "Russia : Reshaping Economic Geography," World Bank Other Operational Studies 13052, The World Bank.
- Alexander Plekhanov & Asel Isakova, 2012. "Customs Union and Kazakhstan's Imports," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 442, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
- Csaba Weiner, 2011. "Foreign Direct Investments in Russia and the Hungarian-Based Investors," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 104-115.
- Favaro, Edgardo & Smits, Karlis & Bakanova, Marina, 2012. "Structural challenges for SOEs in Belarus : a case study of the machine building sector," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6010, The World Bank.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.