IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wai/econwp/15-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vegetative Effects of Fencing and Ungulate Herbivores in Waingaro, New Zealand: A 10 Year Study

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela Kaval

Abstract

Fencing of remnant native vegetation and removing ungulate populations is commonly used for restoring native biodiversity throughout New Zealand. In this investigation, a complete tree and fern population count was conducted in 2006, 2010, and 2015 for permanent plots to determine if fencing made a difference in Waingaro, New Zealand. It was expected that fencing and the removal of ungulate browsing would increase the number of native plants and the number of palatable preferred plant species. The opposite was observed, with a decrease in native plants and a decrease in palatable species. Therefore, fencing and the removal of ungulate browsing may not be enough to increase the number of native species or increase the number of palatable species under a closed canopy within the timeframes investigated. The removal of non-native vegetation (for example, Selaginella kraussiana) may also be required.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela Kaval, 2015. "Vegetative Effects of Fencing and Ungulate Herbivores in Waingaro, New Zealand: A 10 Year Study," Working Papers in Economics 15/11, University of Waikato.
  • Handle: RePEc:wai:econwp:15/11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.its.waikato.ac.nz/wai/econwp/1511.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    native bush regeneration; fencing; grazing exclusion; native vegetation rehabilitation; vegetation survey; browsing; ungulate; biodiversity restoration; Queen Elizabeth covenants; palatable vegetation; unpalatable vegetation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wai:econwp:15/11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Geua Boe-Gibson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dewaknz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.