IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vor/issues/2013-9-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Article 21 Of Constitution Of India And Right To Livelihood

Author

Listed:
  • Neepa Jani

Abstract

In any organized society, right to live as a human being is not ensured by meeting only the animal needs of man. It is secured only when he is assured of all facilities to develop himself and is freed from restrictions which inhibit his growth. All human rights are designed to achieve this object. Right to live guaranteed in any civilized society implies the right to food, water, decent environment, education, medical care and shelter. The word 'life' as employed by Article 21 takes in its sweep not only the concept of mere physical existence by also all finer values of life including the right to work and right to livelihood. This right is a fundamental right guaranteed to all persons residing in India, citizens and non-citizens alike. right to life including right to livelihood and work as guaranteed by Article 21 is not reduced to a mere paper platitude but is kept alive, vibrant and pulsating so that the country can effectively march towards the avowed goal of establishment of an egalitarian society as envisaged by the founding fathers while enacting the Constitution of India along with its Preamble. Key words: Article 21, constitution of India, right to livelihood

Suggested Citation

  • Neepa Jani, 2013. "Article 21 Of Constitution Of India And Right To Livelihood," Working papers 2013-9-14, Voice of Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:vor:issues:2013-9-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.voiceofresearch.org/doc/Sep-2013/Sep-2013_14.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rémi de Bercegol & Shankare Gowda, 2019. "A new waste and energy nexus? Rethinking the modernisation of waste services in Delhi," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(11), pages 2297-2314, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vor:issues:2013-9-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Avdhesh Jha (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.