Benchmarking the competitiveness of nations: non-uniform weighting and non-economic dimensions
AbstractThis paper addresses two methodological issues concerning the construction of a composite indicator of national competitiveness. The first is the choice of weights to be used to aggregate the underlying primitive data. Most composite indicators use predetermined fixed weight values that are then applied uniformly to all countries. However, such uniform weighting fails to recognize that countries may have different policy priorities with respect to the different primitive dimensions used to form a given index. To the extent a country’s mix of priorities differs from that represented by the imposed weight pattern, the use of uniform weighting may bias measurement, and hence inferences, of relative competitiveness. We propose in this paper a procedure that allows weights to be endogenously determined and that are applied individually to each country. These country specific weights explicitly take account of a country’s own choices and performance across primitive dimensions. We illustrate our procedure by applying it to examine the widely cited Growth Competitiveness Index developed by the World Economic Forum. The second issue we address is the conceptual scope of national competitiveness indicators. Such indicators often consider only the “economic” domain when assessing relative performance. This singular focus may also bias inferences about relative performance since it ignores other national goals or priorities. We therefore broaden the scope for evaluating relative performance by combining a traditional index of competitiveness with two additional dimensions that may impinge on a country’s performance: environmental sustainability and governance. The resulting Composite Inclusive Index is formed using weights that allow that countries may choose different combinations of the three dimensions but still achieve the same level of overall performance. A performance ranking across countries is then presented based on values of the Composite Inclusive Index.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School in its series Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series with number 2005-2.
Length: 30 pages
Date of creation: 01 Mar 2005
Date of revision:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2005-05-14 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Sahoo, Biresh K. & Acharya, Debashis, 2010. "An alternative approach to monetary aggregation in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 672-682, August.
- Geys, Benny, 2007. "How to make head or tail of bridging and bonding? Adressing the methodological ambiguity," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Processes and Governance SP II 2007-11, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB).
- Coffé, Hilde & Geys, Benny, 2006. "Towards an empirical characterization of bridging and bonding social capital," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Processes and Governance SP II 2006-11, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB).
- Herciu, Mihaela & Ogrean, Claudia, 2011. "A Model for Measuring the National Global Performance and Analyzing its Determinants – The Case of Romania," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 163-177, December.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Isabelle Vandenbroere).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.