IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/van/wpaper/0109.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Identification and Estimation with Contaminated Data: When Does Covariate Data Sharpen Inference?

Author

Listed:
  • Charles H. Mullin

    (Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University)

Abstract

When data contain errors, parameters of interest typically are not identified without imposing strong assumptions. However, in many cases, bounds on these parameters can be constructed under relatively weak assumptions. This paper addresses under what conditions variables in addition to the one of interest, covariate data, tighten these bounds and how to optimally incorporate that information. In particular, covariate data are unable to sharpen inference without imposing some exogenous knowledge about the distribution of errors conditional on the covariates. For example, knowing that the probability of erroneous data is either orthogonal to a covariate or monotonically increasing in a covariate is typically sufficient to sharpen inference. The identification region for the distribution of the variable of interest is constructed and used to develop bounds both on probabilities and on parameters of this distribution that respect stochastic dominance. For the case of bounding parameters that respect stochastic dominance, the necessary and sufficient conditions for covariate data to sharpen inference are derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles H. Mullin, 2001. "Identification and Estimation with Contaminated Data: When Does Covariate Data Sharpen Inference?," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 0109, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:van:wpaper:0109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/VUECON/vu01-w09.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2001
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Robust estimation; contaminated sampling; covariate data; bounds; identification;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:van:wpaper:0109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/econ/wparchive/index.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.