IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uwa/wpaper/18-06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Piketty’s (r – g) Law is Pareto’s Law: Consistent Analyses of Income Distribution Predicated on Inconsistent Definitions of Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Jill Trinh

    (Business School, The University of Western Australia)

  • Michael McLure

    (Business School, The University of Western Australia)

Abstract

On the face of it, Pareto’s law and Piketty’s (r – g) law are inconsistent, with Pareto arguing that real per capita economic growth is the solution to the problem of income inequality and Piketty arguing for redistribution to be funded from a wealth tax. This study, however, establishes that when the same definition of inequality is adopted by the two scholars, Piketty’s and Pareto’s laws are the same economic law. It also establishes that Piketty’s assertion that Pareto treats income distribution as “rock stable” overlooks the critical aspects of Pareto’s law that emphasise change.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill Trinh & Michael McLure, 2018. "Piketty’s (r – g) Law is Pareto’s Law: Consistent Analyses of Income Distribution Predicated on Inconsistent Definitions of Inequality," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 18-06, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:18-06
    Note: MD5 = 60a35ef58c0e3e6bb50a2c451f9dfd72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecompapers.biz.uwa.edu.au/paper/PDF%20of%20Discussion%20Papers/2018/DP%2018.06_Trinh%20and%20McLure.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    distribution; inequality; growth; Pareto; Piketty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B16 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Quantitative and Mathematical
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • D30 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - General
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:18-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sam Tang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuwaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.