IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uwa/wpaper/17-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Thinking Outside the Box: A New History of Edgeworth’s and Pareto’s Development of the Box Diagram

Author

Listed:
  • Michael McLure

    (Business School, The University of Western Australia)

Abstract

Polemical views are held among many historians as to whether the ‘original version’ of the Edgeworth box was drawn by Edgeworth, in his 1881 Mathematical Psychics, or Pareto, in his 1906 Manual of Political Economy. This study demonstrates that that polemic is largely attributable to a failure to consider the relationship between ‘trade’ flow oriented indifference curves drawn in Edgeworth’s Figures 1 and 5 and the implications of the relationship between those two diagrams for the definition of the origin of Edgeworth’s Figure 1. A new history of Edgeworth’s and Pareto’s contributions to the development of the Edgeworth box diagram is presented that highlights the intermediate role played by Pareto’s graph, from his 1902 article ‘On a New Error in the Interpretation of the Theories of Mathematical Economics’, which derives from Edgeworth’s Figure 5 except Pareto maps the indifference curves in the standard ‘allocation’ orientation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael McLure, 2017. "Thinking Outside the Box: A New History of Edgeworth’s and Pareto’s Development of the Box Diagram," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 17-12, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:17-12
    Note: MD5 = a3129bd18850773a4615868d7b9dcbe0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecompapers.biz.uwa.edu.au/paper/PDF%20of%20Discussion%20Papers/2017/DP%2017.12_McLure.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Creedy, 1980. "Some Recent Interpretations of Mathematical Psychics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 267-276, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael McLure & Aldo Montesano, 2020. "Extending Edgeworth: Labour Exchange and Production," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 20-08, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    2. Stavros Drakopoulos & Ioannis Katselidis, 2015. "From Edgeworth to econophysics: a methodological perspective," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 77-95, March.
    3. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2014. "Mathematical Psychics and Hydraulics: The Methodological Influence of Edgeworth and Fisher," MPRA Paper 52981, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Erich Streissler & Werner Neudeck, 1986. "Are there intellectual precursors to the idea of second best optimization?," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 227-242, December.
    5. Tomoyuki Uemiya, 2008. "F.Y. Edgeworth’s Mathematical Psychics and his Utilitarianism: The Derivation from the ‘Sidgwick-Barratt Controversy’," Discussion Paper Series 37, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Mar 2008.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Box diagram; Creedy; Edgeworth; Jaffé; Pareto; Tarascio;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:17-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sam Tang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuwaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.