IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uta/papers/2004_08.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Costs and Benefits of Folic Acid Fortification in the United States: A Comparison of Ex Ante and Ex Post Economic Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Scott D. Grosse
  • Norman J. Waitzman
  • Patrick S. Romano
  • Joseph Mulinare

Abstract

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required that manufacturers of enriched cereal-grain products as of January 1, 1998 fortify their products with folic acid to reduce the number of pregnancies affected a by neural tube defect (NTD). Prior to adoption of the regulation in 1996, three economic evaluations projected net economic benefits or cost savings from folic acid fortification. The expected decline in NTDs was between 2.6% and 10.5%. Birth defects surveillance data indicate a decline of 20% to 30% in births with spina bifida or anencephaly following fortification. We conservatively estimate that the folic acid fortification results in an economic benefit of $425 million per year in the United States, constituting a major regulatory public health success.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott D. Grosse & Norman J. Waitzman & Patrick S. Romano & Joseph Mulinare, 2004. "The Costs and Benefits of Folic Acid Fortification in the United States: A Comparison of Ex Ante and Ex Post Economic Evaluations," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2004_08, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:uta:papers:2004_08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economics.utah.edu/research/publications/2004_08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health; Government policy;

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uta:papers:2004_08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuutus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.