It is now recognized that the growth rate of per capita real income is not the only indicator of development. Development is a multidimensional oncept that focuses on development of human beings through removal of poverty, ill health, illiteracy, and other social deprivations. The observed positive correlation between the growth of GNP per head and the average quality of life may not be as strong as it appears to be. It is argued that the causal relation between income and life expectancy, which is taken as a proxy for the index of quality of life works mainly through the impact of GNP on public expenditure in health care and poverty reduction. The objective of this paper is to examine this issue by using panel data. The dependent variable is life expectancy at birth while explanatory variables are real GDP per capita and per capita public expenditure on health. Using the data set for 29 countries over the 1990-2000 period we find that public provisioning of health services is more important than the growth of real income in expanding the most basic capability for human development.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Utah State University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
2002-10.
Did you know? You can include your works in the database easily by uploading them on the Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) if you do not have access to an institutional RePEc archive.