Underconsumption theories played an important part in the economic policy debates during the Great Depression of the 1930s. The commonsense appeal of the arguments and the clear cut policy advice secured their proponents' popular support. Here, the contributions of John A. Hobson, Emil Lederer, Waddill Catchings and William Foster are analyzed. The background to their thinking in terms of the economic policy debates in the respective countries is discussed and compared. Switzerland is an interesting case in this context since there underconsumption arguments were the only arguments used to challenge the orthodoxy of balanced budgets with the demand for active government policies. In evaluating the contributions discussed here with regard to the innovations of Keynes' General Theory on the one hand, the tradition of classical political economy on the other, it is argued that although underconsumptionists share certain concerns with Keynes's analysis, central theoretical notions are carried over from classical economics.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Find related papers by JEL classification: B2 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 B3 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Thought: Individuals E3 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles N1 - Economic History - - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Growth and Fluctuations
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Did you know? You can include your works in the database easily by uploading them on the Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) if you do not have access to an institutional RePEc archive.