IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-323596.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

From Abstract News Users to Living Citizens: Assessing Audience Engagement Through a Professional Lens

Author

Listed:
  • Constanza Gajardo
  • Irene Costera Meijer
  • David Domingo

Abstract

Journalists’ increasing focus on news users is often seen as diverting the news agenda away from the core issues that are important to democracy. Hence, the practices of connecting journalists to the audience tend to be assessed as detrimental to the democratic function of journalism: informing citizens and facilitating public opinion. However, this normative link between practice and ideals has rarely been empirically addressed when studying audience engagement. In this article we use a case study (BiobioChile) to provide a more precise understanding of the democratic relevance that everyday engagement with the audience—through and beyond metrics—entails for journalism. First, our analysis suggests that audiences can be integrated into journalism’s democratic framework by moving beyond the dilemma of informed citizenship versus news user’s metrics to include what we propose to call living citizens: empirical concrete living beings grounded in journalistic practice. Second, we distinguish three audience oriented roles—observer, listener and connector—aimed both at maximizing the attention of news users, and at making sense of their needs as living citizens. These roles cover verifiable routines and values, thereby enabling a better assessment of the fulfilment of the democratic ideals of journalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Constanza Gajardo & Irene Costera Meijer & David Domingo, 2021. "From Abstract News Users to Living Citizens: Assessing Audience Engagement Through a Professional Lens," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/323596, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/323596
    Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/323596/3/17512786.2021.pdf
    File Function: Article
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Hagar & Nicholas Diakopoulos, 2019. "Optimizing Content with A/B Headline Testing: Changing Newsroom Practices," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 117-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miroslav Mandić & Iva Gregurec & UgljeÅ¡a Vujović, 2023. "Measuring the Effectiveness of Online Sales by Conducting A/B Testing," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 35(2), pages 223-249.
    2. Joan Calzada & Nestor Duch-Brown & Ricard Gil, 2021. "Do search engines increase concentration in media markets?," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2021/415, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    3. Kristina Gligorić & George Lifchits & Robert West & Ashton Anderson, 2021. "Linguistic effects on news headline success: Evidence from thousands of online field experiments (Registered Report Protocol)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Silke Fürst, 2020. "In the Service of Good Journalism and Audience Interests? How Audience Metrics Affect News Quality," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 270-280.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/323596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.